↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Use of Agent-Based Models for Tobacco Regulation

Overview of attention for book
Assessing the Use of Agent-Based Models for Tobacco Regulation
The National Academies Press
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing the Use of Agent-Based Models for Tobacco Regulation
Published by
The National Academies Press, March 2015
DOI 10.17226/19018
ISBNs
978-0-309-31722-1, 978-0-309-31723-8, 978-0-309-31724-5, 978-0-309-31726-9, 978-0-309-31725-2
Authors

Robert Wallace, Amy Geller, V. Ayano Ogawa, Editors; Committee on the Assessment of Agent-Based Models to Inform Tobacco Product Regulation; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Institute of Medicine, , Institute of Medicine

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 14%
Engineering 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 5%
Psychology 9 5%
Other 50 26%
Unknown 71 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2024.
All research outputs
#1,194,234
of 28,805,922 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#1,451
of 10,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,500
of 282,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#25
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,805,922 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.