Ingested foreign bodies are a frequent presentation in pediatric emergency departments. Although some pass spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract, the majority of esophageal-ingested foreign bodies (EFB) require removal.
Kids' Inpatient Database (1997-2009) was used to identify children (aged <20 y) with EFB (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 935.1). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were constructed to identify predictors of resource utilization.
Overall, 14,767 EFB cases were identified. Most patients were <5 y of age (72%), boys (57%), and non-Caucasian (55%), with a median (interquartile range) length of stay (LOS) of 1 (1) d, and total charges of $11,003 (8503). A total of 11,180 procedures were performed, most commonly esophagoscopy (77%), followed by bronchoscopy (20%), gastroscopy (2%), and rarely surgery (0.8%). By multivariate logistic regression, increased total charges were associated with a diagnosis of esophageal ulceration (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57), esophagoscopy (OR = 1.42), and bronchoscopy (OR = 1.62), all P < 0.001. Total charges also increased with admission to urban nonteaching hospitals (OR = 1.51) versus urban teaching hospitals, P < 0.001. Prolonged LOS (≥1 d) was associated with admission to a hospital in the Midwest (OR = 3.18) and with esophageal ulceration (OR = 2.11) and esophagoscopy (OR = 1.13), P < 0.03. Boys had higher odds of longer hospitalization (OR = 1.21), P < 0.001. Overall hospital mortality was 0.1% (n = 16).
Most EFB occur in children <5 y of age. Esophageal ulceration, esophagoscopy, and bronchoscopy are associated with increased total charges. Esophageal ulceration, esophagoscopy, and boys are associated with an increased LOS. Surgery and hospital mortality are both extremely rare in children with EFB.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
10%
Environmental Science
1
5%
Business, Management and Accounting
1
5%
Nursing and Health Professions
1
5%
Other
2
10%
Unknown
1
5%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Research
#3,273
of 5,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,274
of 278,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Research
#56
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,776 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
