↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Long Tree-Ring Chronologies Provide Evidence of Recent Tree Growth Decrease in a Central African Tropical Forest
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0120962
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 40 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 42 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Computer Science 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 53 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#21,649,098
of 32,447,906 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#134,389
of 216,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,756
of 296,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,710
of 6,441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,447,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.