You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Serological Survey of Infectious Disease in Yellowstone National Park’s Canid Community
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0007042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily S. Almberg, L. David Mech, Douglas W. Smith, Jennifer W. Sheldon, Robert L. Crabtree |
| Abstract |
Gray wolves (Canis lupus) were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park (YNP) after a >70 year absence, and as part of recovery efforts, the population has been closely monitored. In 1999 and 2005, pup survival was significantly reduced, suggestive of disease outbreaks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 233 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 135 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2011.
All research outputs
#13,355,173
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,229
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,347
of 80,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#396
of 500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.