↓ Skip to main content

SH3BP1, an Exocyst-Associated RhoGAP, Inactivates Rac1 at the Front to Drive Cell Motility

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
2 research highlight platforms

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SH3BP1, an Exocyst-Associated RhoGAP, Inactivates Rac1 at the Front to Drive Cell Motility
Published in
Molecular Cell, June 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.032
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The coordination of the several pathways involved in cell motility is poorly understood. Here, we identify SH3BP1, belonging to the RhoGAP family, as a partner of the exocyst complex and establish a physical and functional link between two motility-driving pathways, the Ral/exocyst and Rac signaling pathways. We show that SH3BP1 localizes together with the exocyst to the leading edge of motile cells and that SH3BP1 regulates cell migration via its GAP activity upon Rac1. SH3BP1 loss of function induces abnormally high Rac1 activity at the front, as visualized by in vivo biosensors, and disorganized and instable protrusions, as revealed by cell morphodynamics analysis. Consistently, constitutively active Rac1 mimics the phenotype of SH3BP1 depletion: slow migration and aberrant cell morphodynamics. Our finding that SH3BP1 downregulates Rac1 at the motile-cell front indicates that Rac1 inactivation in this location, as well as its activation by GEF proteins, is a fundamental requirement for cell motility.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 4 3%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 113 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 28%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#6,310
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,788
of 122,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#40
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.