↓ Skip to main content

Consult, Negotiate, and Involve: Evaluation of an Advanced Communication Skills Program for Health Care Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Consult, Negotiate, and Involve: Evaluation of an Advanced Communication Skills Program for Health Care Professionals
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, March 2018
DOI 10.1177/1043454218765136
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Effective communication is central to children, young people, and their families' experiences of health care. Most patient complaints in developed health care systems result from ineffective communication, including inadequate information provision, not feeling listened to, failure to value patients concerns, and patients not feeling involved in care decisions. Advanced communication skills training is now embedded within cancer care policy in the United Kingdom and now features prominently within cancer education in many countries. Here, we share findings from a research evaluation of an advanced communication skills training program dedicated to health professionals caring for children and young people with cancer. We evaluated participants' (n = 59) perceptions of the program, impact on their skills, knowledge, competence, and confidence. An appreciative inquiry design was adopted; data included interviews, precourse-postcourse evaluations, e-mail blog survey, and 360-degree reflective work records. The framework approach underpinned data analysis and triangulation of data sets. Key findings highlighted good and poor practice in health professionals' engagement with children, young people, and their families; the purpose of communicating effectively was not always consistent with collaborative working. Attending a program helped participants expand their knowledge of communication theories and strategies. Participants valued using simulated scenarios to develop their skills and were keen to use their new skills to enhance care delivery. Our emphasis within this evaluation, however, remained on what was communicated, when and how, rather than to what effect. The impact of programs such as these must now be evaluated in terms of patient benefit.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 4 4%
Researcher 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 65 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 22%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 69 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,698,249
of 27,788,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
#217
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,399
of 347,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them