↓ Skip to main content

Effects of brand variants on smokers’ choice behaviours and risk perceptions

Overview of attention for article published in Tobacco Control, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of brand variants on smokers’ choice behaviours and risk perceptions
Published in
Tobacco Control, March 2015
DOI 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052094
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Australian tobacco companies have introduced evocative variant names that could re-create the aspirational connotations plain packaging aims to remove. To inform future regulation, we explored how brand descriptors affected smokers' responses to plain packs featuring different variant name combinations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 27 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 33 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,166,654
of 28,757,281 outputs
Outputs from Tobacco Control
#615
of 3,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,184
of 282,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tobacco Control
#12
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,757,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.