↓ Skip to main content

Integrating Video Simulation Scenarios Into Online Nursing Instruction.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nursing Education, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Integrating Video Simulation Scenarios Into Online Nursing Instruction.
Published in
Journal of Nursing Education, April 2018
DOI 10.3928/01484834-20180322-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Jo Stanley, Jennifer Serratos, Wendy Matthew, Dinorah Fernandez, Michelle Dang

Abstract

As nursing programs continue to expand online, innovative pedagogies that support online teaching and learning practices grounded in theoretical constructs are needed. Video simulation scenarios and VoiceThread technology were used to create a model of online instruction that promotes active student participation and aligns with course objectives and content. Kolb's experiential learning theory serves as the framework for this project. The integration of multimedia in the course gave students a collaborative experience where they can apply their knowledge to the simulation scenarios. Inclusion of the vignettes was found to be effective in addressing specific areas of curriculum while stimulating student engagement. Increased use of online delivery for nursing education necessitates course designs that promote student interaction and foster community. Teaching and learning practices that include technologies and are supported by theoretical constructs promote best practices for online instruction. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(4):245-249.].

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Lecturer 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 51 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 23%
Social Sciences 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Psychology 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 54 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#9,387,527
of 34,518,599 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Education
#100
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,797
of 372,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Education
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,599 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.