↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating an Electronic Health Record Intervention for Management of Heart Failure Among Veterans

Overview of attention for article published in Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating an Electronic Health Record Intervention for Management of Heart Failure Among Veterans
Published in
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, December 2018
DOI 10.1089/tmj.2017.0307
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We studied the feasibility of using the Veteran Health Administration's electronic health record (EHR), My HealtheVet, as an educational and monitoring tool for veterans with heart failure (HF). We enrolled 120 HF patients with a mean age (±standard deviation): 64.8 ± 9.6, range: 41-91 years. There were 105 (87.5%) non-Hispanics, 15 (12.5%) Hispanics, 91 (75.8%) whites, and 20 (16.5%) blacks, and 62 (51.7%) were married. Study participants received educational material on managing their HF and were monitored on their weight and HF symptoms weekly. Surveys on My HealtheVet use and secondary outcomes including knowledge of their illness, quality of life (QoL), and self-efficacy were conducted at baseline and 26 weeks after enrollment. Among the participants, 55 (45.8%) had used My HealtheVet. The number of weeks each user responded to the weekly messages by the care coordinator ranged from 1 (4%) to 26 (100%) with a median of 8. Secondary outcome data were available for 54 patients (24 users and 30 nonusers) who participated in both baseline and 26-week surveys. There was a significant improvement in QoL (p < 0.01) among users of My HealtheVet compared with nonusers. There were no significant differences with respect to self-efficacy or HF knowledge. Use of My HealtheVet and ease in using the HealtheVet portal increased from baseline to follow-up. EHR-based interventions have potential for HF monitoring and case management, and may be feasible in improving QoL for patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 24 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Engineering 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#31,336,860
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#2,008
of 2,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#438,060
of 490,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#34
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.