↓ Skip to main content

Impaired Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor II Signaling in a Transforming Growth Factor-β–Dependent Mouse Model of Pulmonary Hypertension and in Systemic Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impaired Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor II Signaling in a Transforming Growth Factor-β–Dependent Mouse Model of Pulmonary Hypertension and in Systemic Sclerosis
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1164/rccm.201408-1464oc
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Up to 10% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) develop pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This risk persists throughout the disease and is time dependent, suggesting that SSc is a susceptibility factor. Outcome for SSc-PAH is poor compared with heritable or idiopathic forms, despite clinical and pathological similarities. Although susceptibility in heritable PAH and idiopathic PAH is strongly associated with gene mutations leading to reduced expression of bone morphogenetic protein receptor (BMPR) II, these mutations have not been observed in SSc-PAH.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2026.
All research outputs
#4,172,760
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#3,986
of 15,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,318
of 304,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#32
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.