↓ Skip to main content

Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations

Overview of attention for article published in Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK), December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations
Published in
Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK), December 2014
DOI 10.1017/s146342361400053x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Aim The aims of this study were twofold: (a) to explore whether specific components of shared decision making were present in consultations involving nurse prescribers (NPs), pharmacist prescribers (PPs) and general practitioners (GPs) and (b) to relate these to self-reported patient outcomes including satisfaction, adherence and patient perceptions of practitioner empathy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 42 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 10%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 49 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#21,787,022
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK)
#390
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,927
of 422,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK)
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.