↓ Skip to main content

Effect of total sleep deprivation on postprandial metabolic and insulin responses in shift workers and non-shift workers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endocrinology, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of total sleep deprivation on postprandial metabolic and insulin responses in shift workers and non-shift workers
Published in
Journal of Endocrinology, May 2010
DOI 10.1677/joe-10-0077
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Epidemiological studies have shown that shift workers are at a greater risk of developing cardiovascular disease which may, in part, be related to metabolic and hormonal changes. Partial sleep deprivation, a common consequence of rotating shift work, has been shown to affect glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. The current study investigated the effects of one night of total sleep deprivation, as a proxy for the first night shift, on postprandial glucose, insulin and lipid (triacylglycerols (TAGs) and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs)) responses under controlled laboratory conditions in shift workers and non-shift workers. Eleven experienced shift workers (35.7+/-7.2 years, mean+/-s.d.) who had worked in shifts for 8.7+/-5.25 years were matched with 13 non-shift workers who had worked for 32.8+/-6.4 years. After an adaptation night and a baseline sleep night, volunteers were kept awake for 30.5 h, followed by a nap (4 h) and recovery sleep. Blood samples were taken prior to and after a standard breakfast following baseline sleep, total sleep deprivation and recovery sleep. Basal TAG levels prior to the standard breakfast were significantly lower after sleep deprivation, indicating higher energy expenditure. Basal NEFA levels were significantly lower after recovery sleep. Postprandial insulin and TAG responses were significantly increased, and the NEFA response was decreased after recovery sleep, suggestive of insulin insensitivity. Although there were no overall significant differences between non-shift workers and shift workers, non-shift workers showed significantly higher basal insulin levels, lower basal NEFA levels, and an increased postprandial insulin and a decreased NEFA response after recovery sleep. In future, the reasons for these inter-group differences are to be investigated.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 20%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endocrinology
#1,982
of 2,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,088
of 103,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endocrinology
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.