↓ Skip to main content

ナケルクロアブラバチとコレマンアブラバチの併用による2種アブラムシに対する防除効果

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Report of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ナケルクロアブラバチとコレマンアブラバチの併用による2種アブラムシに対する防除効果
Published in
Annual Report of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society, December 2017
DOI 10.11337/ktpps.2016.81
Authors

長坂 幸吉, 日本 典秀, 上杉 龍士, 勾坂 晶, 光永 貴之

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Annual Report of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society
#7
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,458
of 451,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Report of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them