Physical activity is currently commonly summarized by simple composite scores of total activity, such as total metabolic equivalent score (METS), without further information about the many specific aspects of activities. We sought to identify more comprehensive physical activity patterns, and their association with cardiovascular disease risk factors.
The Northern Manhattan Study is a multiethnic cohort of stroke-free individuals. Questionnaires were used to capture multiple dimensions of leisure-time physical activity. Participants were grouped into METS categories and also into clusters by multivariate mixture modeling of activity frequency, duration, energy expenditure, and number of activity types. Associations between clusters and risk factors were assessed using χ(2) tests.
Using data available in 3293 participants, we identified six model-based clusters that were differentiated by frequency and diversity of activities, rather than activity duration. High activity clusters had lower prevalence of the risk factors compared with those with lower activity; associations with obesity and hypertension remained significant after adjusting for METS (P = .027, .043). METS and risk factors were not significantly associated after adjusting for the clusters.
Data-driven clustering method is a principled, generalizable approach to depict physical activity and form subgroups associated with cardiovascular risk factors independently of METS.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Epidemiology
#1,915
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,556
of 278,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Epidemiology
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
