↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adoption of Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy in the United States
Published in
Urology, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess adoption of pre-biopsy prostate MRI in the United States and evaluate factors associated with MRI-Bx use. Prior reports have shown improved cancer detection with magnetic resonance image-guided prostate biopsies (MRI-Bx) vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided methods (TRUS-Bx). Population-based trends of their use and outcomes have not been previously characterized. Using private insurance claims (2009-2015), we identified men who underwent prostate biopsy. Exposures were biopsy year and geographic region defined by metropolitan statistical area. Outcomes included biopsy type (MRI-Bx, TRUS-Bx, transperineal) based on procedure codes and cancer detection based on a new diagnosis for prostate cancer (ICD-9-CM 185). Hierarchical mixed-effects multivariable regression estimated odds of receiving MRI-Bx. We identified 241,681 men (mean age 57.5±5.4 years) who underwent biopsy. MRI-Bx use rose rapidly (0.2% in 2009 to 6.5% in 2015, p<0.001). Overall, 3,429 men received MRI prior to biopsy, more commonly in metropolitan statistical areas (OR (odds ratio) 1.90, 95% CI 1.66-2.19). In 2015, nearly 18% of men with prior negative biopsy underwent a pre-biopsy MRI. Patients with prior negative biopsies were over four times more likely to receive MRI-guidance (vs. no prior, OR 4.63, 4.27-5.02) and had a greater chance of cancer detection with MRI-Bx (25.2% vs. 19.7% TRUS-Bx, p=0.010). Among men undergoing prostate biopsy, pre-biopsy prostate MRI utilization was concentrated within urban areas and among patients with prior negative biopsies, where its use was associated with superior cancer detection compared to traditional TRUS-guided biopsies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,789,275
of 28,932,665 outputs
Outputs from Urology
#575
of 9,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,676
of 347,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urology
#9
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,932,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.