↓ Skip to main content

Nonpharmacological Interventions for Pain Management in Paramedicine and the Emergency Setting: A Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nonpharmacological Interventions for Pain Management in Paramedicine and the Emergency Setting: A Review of the Literature
Published in
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), March 2015
DOI 10.1155/2015/873039
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Paramedicine and the emergency medical services have been moving in the direction of advancing pharmaceutical intervention for the management of pain in both acute and chronic situations. This coincides with other areas of advanced life support and patient management strategies that have been well researched and continue to benefit from the increasing evidence. Even though paramedic practice is firmly focused on pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain, there is emerging evidence proposing a range of nonpharmacological options that can have an important role in pain management. This review highlights literature that suggests that paramedicine and emergency medical services should be considering the application of complementary and alternative therapies which can enhance current practice and reduce the use of pharmacological interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 19%
Student > Master 25 14%
Other 12 6%
Researcher 10 5%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 65 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 57 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 19%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 65 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,384,263
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#1,593
of 9,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,163
of 307,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#47
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.