↓ Skip to main content

倒壊した鎌倉・鶴岡八幡宮の大イチョウ

Overview of attention for article published in Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
倒壊した鎌倉・鶴岡八幡宮の大イチョウ
Published in
Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo, March 2012
DOI 10.15080/chitoka.67.0_11
Authors

足立 久男

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,355,246
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo
#2
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,199
of 168,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 48 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them