↓ Skip to main content

Anatomy and biomechanics of the craniovertebral junction.

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgical Focus, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anatomy and biomechanics of the craniovertebral junction.
Published in
Neurosurgical Focus, April 2015
DOI 10.3171/2015.1.focus14807
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has unique anatomical structures that separate it from the subaxial cervical spine. In addition to housing vital neural and vascular structures, the majority of cranial flexion, extension, and axial rotation is accomplished at the CVJ. A complex combination of osseous and ligamentous supports allow for stability despite a large degree of motion. An understanding of anatomy and biomechanics is essential to effectively evaluate and address the various pathological processes that may affect this region. Therefore, the authors present an up-to-date narrative review of CVJ anatomy, normal and pathological biomechanics, and fixation techniques.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 12 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 69 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 33%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 83 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,058,151
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgical Focus
#102
of 2,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,473
of 307,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgical Focus
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.