↓ Skip to main content

Simulated Patients’ Perspectives of and Perceived Role in Medical Students’ Professional Identity Development

Overview of attention for article published in Simulation in Healthcare, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Simulated Patients’ Perspectives of and Perceived Role in Medical Students’ Professional Identity Development
Published in
Simulation in Healthcare, April 2015
DOI 10.1097/sih.0000000000000082
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Much has been written about medical students' professional identity formation, the process of "becoming" a doctor. During their training, medical students interact with a range of teachers and trainers. Among these are simulated patients (SPs) who role-play patients, assisting students with their communication, procedural, and physical examination skills. With SPs regularly interacting with students, this qualitative study explored their views of students' emerging professional identities at one Australian medical school. SPs' contributions to developing professional identities were also explored. Fourteen SPs were interviewed individually or in pairs. After template analysis of the transcripts using a priori themes, a follow-up focus group (n = 7) was arranged. Although being older (implying maturity and more life experience) and exposure to real patients and previous health care experience were identified as contributing to developing an identity as a doctor, SPs recognized that for some, an existing professional identity might impede the development of a new identity. Simulated patients were of the opinion that they contributed to students' professional identities by creating a supportive environment for honing skills, which they did by realistically role-playing patient scripts, by making their bodies available, and by providing feedback as "patients." Through their authentic portrayal of patients and through their feedback, we are of the opinion that our SPs can contribute to students' developing identities as doctors. As lay individuals who often encounter students longitudinally, we believe that SPs offer a particular lens through which to view students' emerging identities as future doctors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 29 32%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 40%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2015.
All research outputs
#11,997,489
of 33,918,391 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#452
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,140
of 305,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,918,391 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.