↓ Skip to main content

台湾における地方病性下肢壊療 (鳥脚病) について

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Japan Society of Tropical Medicine, May 1964
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
台湾における地方病性下肢壊療 (鳥脚病) について
Published in
Proceedings of the Japan Society of Tropical Medicine, May 1964
DOI 10.14876/tmh1960.5.19
Authors

曽 文賓

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,051,839
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Japan Society of Tropical Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283
of 1,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Japan Society of Tropical Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.