↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Food and Nutrition Research

Overview of attention for book
Advances in Food and Nutrition Research
Elsevier Science
Attention for Chapter: Maternal fumonisin exposure as a risk factor for neural tube defects.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Maternal fumonisin exposure as a risk factor for neural tube defects.
Book title
Advances in Food and Nutrition Research
Published in
Advances in Food & Nutrition Research, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/s1043-4526(08)00605-0
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-374439-5
Authors

Gelineau-van Waes J, Voss KA, Stevens VL, Speer MC, Riley RT, J. Gelineau‐van Waes, K.A. Voss, V.L. Stevens, M.C. Speer, R.T. Riley

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#7,124,371
of 24,748,616 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Food & Nutrition Research
#107
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,943
of 182,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Food & Nutrition Research
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,748,616 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.