↓ Skip to main content

Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
582 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, May 2015
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12388
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 582 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 10 2%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 563 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 20%
Student > Master 100 17%
Researcher 93 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 7%
Student > Postgraduate 36 6%
Other 93 16%
Unknown 103 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 256 44%
Environmental Science 138 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 <1%
Other 17 3%
Unknown 136 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,736,915
of 27,804,439 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,129
of 2,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,710
of 282,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,804,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.