↓ Skip to main content

DASH Score and Subsequent Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: The Findings From Million Veteran Program

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DASH Score and Subsequent Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: The Findings From Million Veteran Program
Published in
Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, April 2018
DOI 10.1161/jaha.117.008089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luc Djoussé, Yuk‐Lam Ho, Xuan‐Mai T. Nguyen, David R. Gagnon, Peter W.F. Wilson, Kelly Cho, J. Michael Gaziano, the VA Million Veteran Program, Ildiko Halasz, Daniel Federman, Jean Beckham, Scott E. Sherman, Peruvemba Sriram, Philip S. Tsao, Edward J. Boyko, Junzhe Xu, Frank Lederle, Louis J. Dellitalia, Rachel McArdle, Laurence Kaminsky, Alan C. Swann, Mark B. Hamner, Hermes J. Florez, Prashant Pandya, Gerardo Villarreal, Peter Wilson, Timothy R. Morgan, Lori Davis, Robin A. Hurley, Laurence Meyer, Sunil K. Ahuja, Eric P. Konicki, David Cohen, Jack Lichy, Jeffrey Whittle, Kathlyn Sue Haddock, Karl D. Straub, John T. Callaghan, Samuel M. Aguayo, Samir Gupta, Ronald G. Washburn, Mary E. Oehlert, Adriana M. Hung, Agnes Wallbom, Robert Keith, Elif Sonel, Ronald B. Schifman, Richard D. Childress, Michael F. Godschalk, Alan R. Shuldiner, Padmashri Rastogi, Salvador Gutierrez, Ronald Fernando, Pran R. Iruvanti, Darshana Jhala, Carlos Rosado‐Rodriguez, Stephen M. Mastorides, John B. Harley, Kristin Mattocks, Robert T. Striker, Michael Rauchman, John Wells, Zuhair K. Ballas, Susan S. Woods, Shing Yeh, Nora R. Ratcliffe, Jon B. Klein, Adam G. Golden, Harold M. Ginzburg, Satish Sharma, Kris Ann K. Oursler, Mary A. Whooley, Gretchen Gibson

Abstract

While adherence to healthful dietary patterns has been associated with a lower risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the general population, limited data are available among US veterans. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) food pattern is associated with a lower risk of developing CAD among veterans. We analyzed data on 153 802 participants of the Million Veteran Program enrolled between 2011 and 2016. Information on dietary habits was obtained using a food frequency questionnaire at enrollment. We used electronic health records to assess the development of CAD during follow-up. Of the 153 802 veterans who provided information on diet and were free of CAD at baseline, the mean age was 64.0 (SD=11.8) years and 90.4% were men. During a mean follow-up of 2.8 years, 5451 CAD cases occurred. The crude incidence rate of CAD was 14.0, 13.1, 12.6, 12.3, and 11.1 cases per 1000 person-years across consecutive quintiles of Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension score. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for CAD were 1.0 (ref), 0.91 (0.84-0.99), 0.87 (0.80-0.95), 0.86 (0.79-0.94), and 0.80 (0.73-0.87) from the lowest to highest quintile of Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension score controlling for age, sex, body mass index, race, smoking, exercise, alcohol intake, and statin use (P linear trend, <0.0001). Our data are consistent with an inverse association between Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension diet score and incidence of CAD among US veterans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 44 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Psychology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 48 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,965,460
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#4,069
of 11,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,332
of 370,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#107
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.