↓ Skip to main content

Investigation of the effectiveness of a split sleep schedule in sustaining sleep and maintaining performance

Overview of attention for article published in Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 1,696)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Investigation of the effectiveness of a split sleep schedule in sustaining sleep and maintaining performance
Published in
Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, September 2014
DOI 10.3109/07420528.2014.957305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#153,763
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#29
of 1,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,105
of 291,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.