You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Crystal Morphology of Poly(L-lactic Acid) and Poly(D-lactic Acid) Blends during Cooling and Heating Processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kobunshi Ronbunshu, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1295/koron.2014-0039 |
| Authors |
Go MATSUBA, Kota HEMMI, Hideto TSUJI, Takahiko KAWAI, Toshiji KANAYA, Kiyotsuna TOYOHARA, Kohei ENDO |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 50% |
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 2 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 25% |
| Engineering | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,267,098
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Kobunshi Ronbunshu
#187
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,787
of 353,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kobunshi Ronbunshu
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.