↓ Skip to main content

Direct observation during surgery shows preservation of cerebral microcirculation in patients with traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Neurological Sciences, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Direct observation during surgery shows preservation of cerebral microcirculation in patients with traumatic brain injury
Published in
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.044
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To describe the alterations of the cortical microcirculation of the brain (blood flow and vessel density) in TBI patients who and compare them with a control group. Prospective and observational study in a third-level university hospital. Cortical microcirculation in the brain was directly observed using sidestream dark-field (SDF) imaging in 14 patients who underwent surgery: 5 subdural hematomas (SDH) and 9 parenchymal lesions (contusions/hematomas). In this last set of patients, images were recorded in the "pericontusional" areas and in the "surrounding" brain (areas that were as far from the lesion as the craniotomy allowed). These patients were compared to five patients who underwent craniotomy for a disease that did not affect the cortex. There were fewer "pericontusional" images that could be analyzed due to the presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage. The proportion or perfused vessels was similar in all groups: control 99.5%±1.3%; SDH 98.6%±2.4%; "pericontusional" area 98.2%±2.4%; "surrounding" area 98.4%±2.5% (p=0.145). The perfused vessel density index was smaller in the "pericontusional" area: control 6.5±1.6 l/mm; SDH 6.5±2.5 l/mm; "pericontusional" area 5.4±2.6 l/mm; "surrounding" 6.6±2.1 l/mm (p=0.07). Although the analysis of pericontusional zone was difficult, there were fewer vessels than in the controls and there was no change in the flow. In the surrounding zone and in patients with SDH, we did not document alterations in the microcirculation. Direct imaging of cerebral microcirculation in TBI patients showed that despite serious brain injury the cerebral microcirculation was remarkably well preserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 45%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,743,397
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#3,347
of 5,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,784
of 280,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#61
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.