↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non medical prescribing leads views on their role and the implementation of non medical prescribing from a multi-organisational perspective
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-142
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the United Kingdom, non-medical prescribing (NMP) has been identified as one way to improve healthcare quality and efficiency. Healthcare organisations are charged with overseeing the clinical governance of NMP and guidance recommends the identification of a lead director to be responsible for its implementation. While over twelve million items are prescribed each year by the 50,000 qualified NMPs its uptake is inconsistent. Several studies have explored the barriers to NMP at a practice level, however little is known about the role the NMP lead and the implementation of NMP from an organisational perspective. The aim of this research was to explore the role of the organisational NMP lead across a range of practice settings within one Strategic Health Authority (SHA) and consider the development of NMP from a multi-organisational perspective.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,836,891
of 26,127,783 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,551
of 8,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,665
of 124,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,127,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.