↓ Skip to main content

Exome sequencing links mutations in PARN and RTEL1 with familial pulmonary fibrosis and telomere shortening

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exome sequencing links mutations in PARN and RTEL1 with familial pulmonary fibrosis and telomere shortening
Published in
Nature Genetics, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ng.3278
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an age-related disease featuring progressive lung scarring. To elucidate the molecular basis of IPF, we performed exome sequencing of familial kindreds with pulmonary fibrosis. Gene burden analysis comparing 78 European cases and 2,816 controls implicated PARN, an exoribonuclease with no previous connection to telomere biology or disease, with five new heterozygous damaging mutations in unrelated cases and none in controls (P = 1.3 × 10(-8)); mutations were shared by all affected relatives (odds in favor of linkage = 4,096:1). RTEL1, an established locus for dyskeratosis congenita, harbored significantly more new damaging and missense variants at conserved residues in cases than in controls (P = 1.6 × 10(-6)). PARN and RTEL1 mutation carriers had shortened leukocyte telomere lengths, and we observed epigenetic inheritance of short telomeres in family members. Together, these genes explain ∼7% of familial pulmonary fibrosis and strengthen the link between lung fibrosis and telomere dysfunction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 304 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 14%
Student > Master 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 60 19%
Unknown 88 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 95 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#593,214
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,065
of 8,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,572
of 307,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#21
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.