↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of rapid colonoscopy preparation using a new gut lavage solution

Overview of attention for article published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, February 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of rapid colonoscopy preparation using a new gut lavage solution
Published in
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, February 1982
DOI 10.1016/s0016-5107(82)72956-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Goldman, Mark Reichelderfer

Abstract

The traditional colonoscopy preparation of laxatives and enemas requires 2 days to complete and is occasionally unsatisfactory. The alternative method, gut lavage with saline-based solutions, is hazardous in elderly or compromised patients because of overhydration. We studied a new, orally ingested electrolyte solution containing sodium sulfate and polyethylene glycol as preparation for elective colonoscopy in a consecutive series of 43 patients. Almost all patients achieved a good to excellent preparation. There were no changes in fluid or electrolyte balance and no complications of the procedure. Colonoscopy preparation with this technique is rapid, effective, and well tolerated and is a safe alternative to the standard approach.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,593,321
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#3,475
of 7,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,309
of 32,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.