↓ Skip to main content

Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers of Macrophage and Lymphocyte Activation After Traumatic Brain Injury in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers of Macrophage and Lymphocyte Activation After Traumatic Brain Injury in Children
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0000000000000400
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The magnitude and role of the cellular immune response following pediatric traumatic brain injury remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that macrophage/microglia and T-cell activation occurs following pediatric traumatic brain injury by measuring cerebrospinal fluid levels of soluble cluster of differentiation 163 and ferritin and soluble interleukin-2 receptor α, respectively, and determined whether these biomarkers were associated with relevant clinical variables and outcome. Retrospective analysis of samples from an established, single-center cerebrospinal fluid bank. PICU in a tertiary children's hospital. Sixty-six pediatric patients after severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 8) who were 1 month to 16 years old and 17 control patients who were 1 month to 14 years old. None. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of soluble cluster of differentiation 163, ferritin, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor α were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at two time points (t1 = 17 ± 10 hr; t2 = 72 ± 15 hr) for each traumatic brain injury patient. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of soluble cluster of differentiation 163, ferritin, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor α after traumatic brain injury were compared with controls and analyzed for associations with age, patient sex, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, diagnosis of abusive head trauma, the presence of hemorrhage on CT scan, and Glasgow Outcome Scale score. Cerebrospinal fluid level of soluble cluster of differentiation 163 was increased in traumatic brain injury patients at t2 versus t1 and controls (median, 95.4 ng/mL [interquartile range, 21.8-134.0 ng/mL] vs 31.0 ng/mL [5.7-77.7 ng/mL] and 27.8 ng/mL [19.1-43.1 ng/mL], respectively; p < 0.05). Cerebrospinal fluid level of ferritin was increased in traumatic brain injury patients at t2 and t1 versus controls (8.3 ng/mL [<7.5-19.8 ng/mL] and 8.9 ng/mL [<7.5-26.7 ng/mL] vs <7.5 ng/mL below lower limit of detection, respectively; p < 0.05). Cerebrospinal fluid levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor α in traumatic brain injury patients at t2 and t1 were not different versus controls. Multivariate regression revealed associations between high ferritin and age 4 years or younger, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, abusive head trauma, and unfavorable Glasgow Outcome Scale score. Children with traumatic brain injury demonstrate evidence for macrophage activation after traumatic brain injury, and in terms of cerebrospinal fluid ferritin, this appears more prominent with young age, initial injury severity, abusive head trauma, and unfavorable outcome. Further study is needed to determine whether biomarkers of macrophage activation may be used to discriminate between aberrant and adaptive immune responses and whether inflammation represents a therapeutic target after traumatic brain injury.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Psychology 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2016.
All research outputs
#21,562,409
of 32,317,188 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#2,979
of 4,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,385
of 294,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#31
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,317,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.