To date, islet and whole pancreas transplantation have been largely researched and reported separately. Therefore, for the first time, this review seeks to examine together the recently reported psychological issues as they relate to the two different types of transplantation.
In relation to pancreas transplantation, recent findings indicate potential issues relating to energy levels, including sleep problems; mood problems (anxiety, depression, traumatic stress); social interactions; and identity issues. Similarly, the research on islet allotransplantation (ITA) indicates mood disruptions associated with Type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), which seem to improve as a result of treatment with ITA.
The review indicates a need for more research to guide effective intervention to optimize psychological recovery post islet and/or pancreas transplantation for patients with T1DM. Effective psychological intervention for this group relies on researchers eliciting more detailed knowledge of pretransplant psychosocial issues, not only in relation to how these might vary by transplant group, but also in relation to patient health status vis-à-vis microvascular complications and glycaemic control, and how these issues change across the whole transplant journey.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation
#298
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,910
of 279,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
