↓ Skip to main content

The Landscape of long noncoding RNA classification

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Genetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
patent
8 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
990 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Landscape of long noncoding RNA classification
Published in
Trends in Genetics, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Advances in the depth and quality of transcriptome sequencing have revealed many new classes of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). lncRNA classification has mushroomed to accommodate these new findings, even though the real dimensions and complexity of the noncoding transcriptome remain unknown. Although evidence of functionality of specific lncRNAs continues to accumulate, conflicting, confusing, and overlapping terminology has fostered ambiguity and lack of clarity in the field in general. The lack of fundamental conceptual unambiguous classification framework results in a number of challenges in the annotation and interpretation of noncoding transcriptome data. It also might undermine integration of the new genomic methods and datasets in an effort to unravel the function of lncRNA. Here, we review existing lncRNA classifications, nomenclature, and terminology. Then, we describe the conceptual guidelines that have emerged for their classification and functional annotation based on expanding and more comprehensive use of large systems biology-based datasets.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 990 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 965 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 222 22%
Researcher 145 15%
Student > Master 133 13%
Student > Bachelor 78 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 4%
Other 156 16%
Unknown 212 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 309 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 266 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 2%
Neuroscience 21 2%
Other 75 8%
Unknown 240 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,781,857
of 34,444,361 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Genetics
#207
of 2,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,317
of 307,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Genetics
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,444,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.