In this study, we investigated the significance of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 gene abnormalities in a cohort of 205 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients studied by conventional and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization cytogenetic analysis. Combining these methods, 172 cases (84%) were classified as MYC-, 17 (8%) were MYC+/BCL2-/BCL6-, and 16 (8%) were double/triple-hit lymphomas (i.e. MYC+/BCL2+, MYC+/BCL6+, or MYC+/BCL2+/BCL6+). We found a significant difference in EFS among the three groups (p=0.02), with the double/triple-hit group having the worst EFS. Patients who were MYC+, but BCL2- and BCL6-, had the best EFS. We conclude that patients with MYC+ DLBCL, but without BCL2 or BCL6 abnormalities, do not have a worse outcome when compared to those who are MYC-. However, patients with double/triple-hit DLBCL have a very poor outcome and should be treated with aggressive or novel therapies.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
4%
Other
2
8%
Unknown
5
20%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,077,920
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from Leukemia & Lymphoma
#2,067
of 4,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,907
of 265,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leukemia & Lymphoma
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,041 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
