↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Prototyping Amphiphilic Polymer/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds with Hydration-Induced Self-Fixation Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rapid Prototyping Amphiphilic Polymer/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds with Hydration-Induced Self-Fixation Behavior
Published in
Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, August 2014
DOI 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artem B. Kutikov, Anvesh Gurijala, Jie Song

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 28 27%
Materials Science 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Chemistry 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2025.
All research outputs
#10,201,802
of 31,482,640 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
#293
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,018
of 264,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,482,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.