↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Cigarettes: Vulnerability of Youth

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 266)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Electronic Cigarettes: Vulnerability of Youth
Published in
Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology, March 2015
DOI 10.1089/ped.2015.0490
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Electronic cigarettes have become popular and are heavily promoted as a safer cigarette and an aid to quit smoking. Although they may have value in reducing cigarette use among smokers, they are of limited value in smoking cessation and pose many problems, particularly in children. Nicotine is highly addictive and affects virtually all cells in the body. It is particularly harmful to developing brains and other organs. The electronic nicotine delivery systems are largely uncontrolled and safety risks are manifold. Initiating nicotine use and increasing dependence in the population may be linked with increased tobacco and other addictive substance abuse even if the individual electronic cigarette delivers less harm than a combustible cigarette does.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 45 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 21%
Psychology 13 10%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 51 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2026.
All research outputs
#749,651
of 32,056,643 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology
#7
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,594
of 286,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,056,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them