↓ Skip to main content

Transplant Tourism: Understanding the Risks

Overview of attention for article published in Current Infectious Disease Reports, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transplant Tourism: Understanding the Risks
Published in
Current Infectious Disease Reports, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11908-015-0473-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transplant tourism is commonly defined as travel abroad for the purpose of transplantation, but the term evokes ethical and legal concerns about commercial transplantation. Due to the mismatch in supply and demand for organs, transplant tourism has increased over the last several decades and now accounts for 10 % of transplants worldwide. Patients from the USA who pursue transplantation abroad do so most commonly for renal transplantation, and travel mostly to China, the Philippines, and India. Transplant tourism puts the organ recipient at risk for surgical complications, poor graft outcome, increased mortality, and a variety of infectious complications. Bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections have all been described, and most concerning are the high rates of blood-borne viral infections and invasive, often fatal, fungal infections. Transplant and infectious diseases physicians should have a high degree of suspicion for infectious complications in patients returning from transplantation abroad.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,405,972
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#398
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,064
of 264,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.