↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic Cannabinoid Use: A Case Series of Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Adolescent Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Synthetic Cannabinoid Use: A Case Series of Adolescents
Published in
Journal of Adolescent Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Castellanos, Simar Singh, Gabriel Thornton, Maria Avila, Ana Moreno

Abstract

Synthetic cannabinoid products have been increasingly used by adolescents for the past few years, but little literature exists describing their psychoactive and physical effects. This study describes the psychoactive and physical effects of synthetic cannabinoids as reported by adolescent users.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 25%
Psychology 23 19%
Chemistry 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Adolescent Health
#1,434
of 4,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,723
of 143,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Adolescent Health
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.