↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing collection methods for noninvasive genetic sampling of neotropical felids

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Society Bulletin, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Optimizing collection methods for noninvasive genetic sampling of neotropical felids
Published in
Wildlife Society Bulletin, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/wsb.540
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Environmental Science 11 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,854,407
of 32,803,945 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#104
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,292
of 300,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,803,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.