↓ Skip to main content

Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy after Intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA Alone in Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
2180 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 2145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 332 15%
Other 247 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 178 8%
Student > Bachelor 174 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 168 8%
Other 500 23%
Unknown 581 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 967 44%
Neuroscience 210 10%
Engineering 68 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 2%
Other 166 8%
Unknown 680 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 414. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2026.
All research outputs
#90,227
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,429
of 38,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#743
of 308,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#20
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.