| Title |
Commentary: The need for model development related to Cladophora and nutrient management in Lake Michigan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.03.023 |
| Authors |
Harvey A. Bootsma, Mark D. Rowe, Colin N. Brooks, Henry A. Vanderploeg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 21% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 31% |
| Engineering | 7 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,268,102
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#1,476
of 1,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,797
of 353,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#36
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.