↓ Skip to main content

Splicing of many human genes involves sites embedded within introns

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
19 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Splicing of many human genes involves sites embedded within introns
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkv386
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The conventional model for splicing involves excision of each intron in one piece; we demonstrate this inaccurately describes splicing in many human genes. First, after switching on transcription of SAMD4A, a gene with a 134 kb-long first intron, splicing joins the 3' end of exon 1 to successive points within intron 1 well before the acceptor site at exon 2 is made. Second, genome-wide analysis shows that >60% of active genes yield products generated by such intermediate intron splicing. These products are present at ∼15% the levels of primary transcripts, are encoded by conserved sequences similar to those found at canonical acceptors, and marked by distinctive structural and epigenetic features. Finally, using targeted genome editing, we demonstrate that inhibiting the formation of these splicing intermediates affects efficient exon-exon splicing. These findings greatly expand the functional and regulatory complexity of the human transcriptome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 34%
Computer Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2026.
All research outputs
#4,205,822
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#6,663
of 33,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,996
of 308,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#77
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.