↓ Skip to main content

Animal-to-Animal Variability in Neuromodulation and Circuit Function

Overview of attention for article published in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Animal-to-Animal Variability in Neuromodulation and Circuit Function
Published in
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, April 2015
DOI 10.1101/sqb.2014.79.024828
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Each animal alive in the world is different from all other individuals, while sharing most attributes of form and function with others of the same species. Still other attributes are shared within a phylum, and still others are common to most eukaryotic organisms. All animals have mechanisms that modulate the strength of their synapses or alter the intrinsic excitability of component neurons. What animal-to-animal variability in behavior arises from differences in neuronal structure, ion channel expression, or connectivity, and what variability arises from neuromodulation of brain states? Conversely, can robust behavior be maintained despite variability in circuit components by the action of neuromodulatory inputs? These are fundamental issues relevant to all nervous systems that have been illuminated by many years of study of the small, rhythmic motor circuits found in the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
France 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 57 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 35%
Researcher 12 19%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 35%
Neuroscience 19 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Philosophy 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,831,563
of 26,876,685 outputs
Outputs from Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
#227
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,017
of 279,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,876,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.