↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenetic Decision Support Tools for Antidepressant Drug Prescribing

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Psychiatry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
7 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenetic Decision Support Tools for Antidepressant Drug Prescribing
Published in
American Journal of Psychiatry, April 2018
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17111282
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The accrual and analysis of genomic sequencing data have identified specific genetic variants that are associated with major depressive disorder. Moreover, substantial investigations have been devoted to identifying gene-drug interactions that affect the response to antidepressant medications by modulating their pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties. Despite these advances, individual responses to antidepressants, as well as the unpredictability of adverse side effects, leave clinicians with an imprecise prescribing strategy that often relies on trial and error. These limitations have spawned several combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing products that are marketed to physicians. Typically, combinatorial pharmacogenetic decision support tools use algorithms to integrate multiple genetic variants and assemble the results into an easily interpretable report to guide prescribing of antidepressants and other psychotropic medications. The authors review the evidence base for several combinatorial pharmacogenetic decision support tools whose potential utility has been evaluated in clinical settings. They find that, at present, there are insufficient data to support the widespread use of combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice, although there are clinical situations in which the technology may be informative, particularly in predicting side effects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 17%
Other 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 69 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Psychology 12 6%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 82 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#554,160
of 34,250,479 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#482
of 9,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,617
of 370,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#14
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,250,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.