RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
@2pic4 @takua_scientist 布マスク感染リスク13倍のソース https://t.co/5AUx7iMjra 4割マスク使いまわしソース(画像) https://t.co/7NUUIOY3Ii
@farmingandJesus No, because of the following mask study. If they were lying about masks, I was not interested in taking their novel shot. https://t.co/ZGjQutdEkc
@2pic4 @takua_scientist ちなみにコクランレビューは医療用マスクの話だからな 一般としてのマスクは布マスク等を使うことで逆効果 布マスクを使うと感染リスクが13倍に跳ね上がる https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@Ironyrulesall @wcbuecker Masks don't work dipshit, never did. You're a sheep and a fool. Cloth is WORSE than nothing. You are not trained to use a mask. https://t.co/kdB6hhKb45
@h_yuzuki なお医療用マスクに限定して27万人調べてもマスク効果不明だった 素材を布に変えると感染リスク13倍に激増 https://t.co/5AUx7iMjra 国民の4割は不織布マスク使いまわし https://t.co/Zg0MjG8SKv
@JamesMelville See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmTPU
See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmUnJJ.
RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
@infowars See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmUnJJ.
@MsJulieSLam @TogetherWeMask See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://
@mryoung151 See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmTPUb.
@theBrianaMills because you cunts never stop pushing masks on to other people. just wear your mask and shut the fuck up Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYrh5 https://t.co/0RmrSaFAZa https://t.co/u1MR1VUlEj https://t.co/WQgA4SY7nL https://t.co/zeOAD2wwV
@DiedSuddenly_ See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmTPU
@Nantanreikan Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. https://t.co/h5ODaNWHuI
@I_am_Steele @ApatheticNo @HilanderKW1981 @krassenstein @imjdsharp https://t.co/ScZsKteFP0 Increase risk of infection
@JamesSheph41105 show some science on how much masks work.. Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co
@TBD77 @EmmaLouMarsha11 @BB0941167867205 @ItsreallyRog @Smithie77 https://t.co/r90RbGiK7D "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." The study found that cloth mask wearers had higher rates of infection than even th
This is why masks don't work. Most people are wearing the wrong kind or they're wearing them the wrong way. This whole thing is retarded. I'm not going to live my life scared of the air.
oh no look at all those sources 😂
@PrognosticChats science is not your thing. your science is all about feelings Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8o
@Violet_Kitteee dont bother reading science Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co/0uufLED2kg http
The desperation is thick. Like pathogen soup.
@GhostOfSocrates when has masks ever worked? Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co/0uufLED2kg htt
@hausofhemlock IF masks worked then they can use them. otherwise FUCK OFF Masks dont work https://t.co/u1MR1VUlEj https://t.co/WQgA4SY7nL https://t.co/zeOAD2wwVC https://t.co/1gz4qlmO2u https://t.co/Nx8oB11iK2 https://t.co/0uufLECuuI https://t.co/FaJt2q9Io
@DrKarenWalker so you are a retarded doctor. Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co/0uufLED2kg htt
@piersmorgan See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmTPUb.
RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
@PIX11News WPIX is right there to modal verb Election Infection 2.0 to the credulous public Still wear the 'MASK' that US Library of Congress/NIH/.GOV Website Concluded in 2015 "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%"?
@nvdems After you realized that all your followers suffer from credulous personality disorder(masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles/2015/us library of congress report/.GOV website lmfao https://t.co/d42dYaw67R Guess what? The GOP 'fake voters' l
@ChuckCallesto Mostly about control and public credulity levels Perfect example: NIH Report in 2015 US Library of Congress accessible off a '.GOV" website clearly states that cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles, and medical masks 44% inef
@FOX5Vegas When BILLIONS of ppl fell for wearing a "97% ineffective at stopping particles.." According to a 2015 US Library of Congress Report from a .Gov website, it was proven that 'CREDULITY' has infected the masses(minus 'M'), ppl will believe anything
@taka32193219 @shion__gbf もう出してる 布マスクはサージカルマスクに比べ呼吸器感染症に13倍感染しやすい https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@TamaTama_tanuki @taka32193219 残念ながらマスクは27万人調べても効果がわからないってデータに加えて素材布にすると感染リスク13倍に跳ね上がるデータがあるんだわ 東京データは裏付けデータにすぎない https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI https://t.co/KUQFZXTJw3
@moreisdifferent Mask fail to provide significant protection against pathogens (covid, Virus) Mask significantly increase the chances of catching pathogens from accumulations in fabric https://t.co/EpoZ4xhMS7
@ojuken1207 @taka32193219 @BanziroG 医療用マスク使って27万人調べても有意差なし 布マスクを使うと感染リスク13倍 国民の4割はマスク使いまわし 逆効果になるのが当たり前 4年マスクしてまだ間違いに気づかないとかどうかしてる https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI https://t.co/QJMWZHaQUK
@salthenurse08 @_nomadic_soul No, that’s FALSE. Cloth masks are potentially worse than nothing. That’s what INCREASED infection means. https://t.co/LzkpZ5qo3y