↓ Skip to main content

Pervasive Protein Thermal Stability Variation during the Cell Cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
113 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pervasive Protein Thermal Stability Variation during the Cell Cycle
Published in
Cell, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.053
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Quantitative mass spectrometry has established proteome-wide regulation of protein abundance and post-translational modifications in various biological processes. Here, we used quantitative mass spectrometry to systematically analyze the thermal stability and solubility of proteins on a proteome-wide scale during the eukaryotic cell cycle. We demonstrate pervasive variation of these biophysical parameters with most changes occurring in mitosis and G1. Various cellular pathways and components vary in thermal stability, such as cell-cycle factors, polymerases, and chromatin remodelers. We demonstrate that protein thermal stability serves as a proxy for enzyme activity, DNA binding, and complex formation in situ. Strikingly, a large cohort of intrinsically disordered and mitotically phosphorylated proteins is stabilized and solubilized in mitosis, suggesting a fundamental remodeling of the biophysical environment of the mitotic cell. Our data represent a rich resource for cell, structural, and systems biologists interested in proteome regulation during biological transitions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 389 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 98 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 21%
Student > Master 27 7%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Other 15 4%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 88 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 165 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 13%
Chemistry 21 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 100 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2025.
All research outputs
#743,835
of 34,570,332 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#3,483
of 19,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,594
of 371,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#86
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,570,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.