↓ Skip to main content

Using Touch-Screen Technology to Assess Smoking in a Low-Income Primary Care Clinic: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Use & Misuse, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Touch-Screen Technology to Assess Smoking in a Low-Income Primary Care Clinic: A Pilot Study
Published in
Substance Use & Misuse, October 2011
DOI 10.3109/10826084.2011.618999
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This pilot study examined the use of a touch-screen tablet personal computer to assess smoking and alcohol use among low-income primary care patients (N = 100) and tested cross-method consistency with a paper assessment. Data were collected in 2009. A touch-screen survey assessed smoking, alcohol use, partner smoking, and acceptability. A separate paper survey assessed smoking, partner smoking, and acceptability. The touch-screen assessment was highly acceptable and reliable. Implications and limitations are noted. Future research should explore the use of touch-screen technology for clinical endeavors requiring a quick assessment of substance use. There was no outside funding for this study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Psychology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2011.
All research outputs
#17,648,479
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Substance Use & Misuse
#1,562
of 1,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,561
of 132,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Use & Misuse
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.