↓ Skip to main content

Descriptive Epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Descriptive Epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort
Published in
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2010
DOI 10.1177/0363546510378645
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Predictors for these worse outcomes are not known. The Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Group was developed to perform a multisurgeon, multicenter prospective longitudinal study to obtain sufficient subjects to allow multivariable analysis to determine predictors of clinical outcome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 358 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 13%
Other 37 10%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Other 75 21%
Unknown 108 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 5%
Sports and Recreations 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 128 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,074,083
of 32,046,026 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#922
of 6,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,081
of 143,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,046,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.