↓ Skip to main content

Using Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Develop a Grounded Theory Project

Overview of attention for article published in Field Methods, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
656 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Develop a Grounded Theory Project
Published in
Field Methods, August 2006
DOI 10.1177/1525822x06287602
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 656 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 11 2%
Australia 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Other 23 4%
Unknown 590 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 158 24%
Student > Master 86 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 9%
Researcher 59 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 38 6%
Other 146 22%
Unknown 107 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 217 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 88 13%
Psychology 53 8%
Computer Science 36 5%
Arts and Humanities 23 4%
Other 121 18%
Unknown 118 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2026.
All research outputs
#9,422,197
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Field Methods
#114
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,370
of 129,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Field Methods
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.