↓ Skip to main content

Building the case for wider use of typhoid vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Building the case for wider use of typhoid vaccines
Published in
Vaccine, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.033
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Efficacious typhoid fever vaccines have been available for decades. Burden of disease estimates indicate a substantial burden of illness and death in low-resource areas. The World Health Organization has recommended that countries consider the use of typhoid vaccines for high-risk groups and populations, and for outbreak control. Despite this, typhoid vaccines are not widely used in endemic areas. By examining strategies to improve burden of disease data, use of transmission dynamic models, economic evaluations, vaccine strategies, and experiences with typhoid vaccine pilot projects, the papers in this supplement help to plot the path toward rational and wider use of typhoid vaccines.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 25%