↓ Skip to main content

Origins of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Origins of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1056/nejmc1502191
Pubmed ID

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,661,386
of 27,145,244 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#24,022
of 34,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,840
of 264,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#245
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,145,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.